Intravenous (IV) hydration spas are wellness clinics that administer fluids, electrolytes, vitamins, or other additives directly into a vein. These services are often marketed as cures or support for hangovers, fatigue, immune enhancement, detoxification, or general wellness.1 JAMA
Over recent years, IV hydration spas have expanded rapidly, becoming part of the larger “medical spa” or “wellness spa” industry. Many advertise customized IV mixtures combining normal saline or dextrose with compounds such as magnesium, glutathione, or nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD). Some spas even offer medications (e.g., anti-nausea or analgesic drugs) alongside hydration cocktails. 1
A 2025 mixed-methods study published in JAMA Internal Medicine reviewed the status of state-level policies in the United States and facility practices in IV hydration spas.1 The study found wide variation in oversight:
No state had passed specific legislation aimed solely at IV hydration spas.
Only 4 states addressed all critical regulatory dimensions (governance, prescriber credentials, dispensing practices, compounding) in their policies.
Facility practices also varied: most spas included hydration therapy plus supplements, but very few provided evidence-based justification or cited sources. 1
Researchers used a “secret shopper” method to call spas and evaluate their protocols. They found that a majority recommended specific IV therapies for common symptoms like headache or cold, yet only about a quarter required consultation with a licensed medical professional first.1
Experts raising caution include medical toxicologists and regulatory researchers. The concern is that IV hydration spas often exist in a regulatory gray zone, where federal oversight is limited (especially for compounded formulations), and state policies are inconsistent or insufficient.1
While some users view IV hydration as benign or helpful, clinicians point out both gaps in evidence and safety concerns:
Infection, bleeding, or bruising at the IV insertion site is among the more frequent risks.
Since the composition of IV cocktails varies across facilities, the actual ingredients may not always match what is advertised. This raises concerns of allergic reactions or unexpected interactions with existing medications.
Excessive doses of vitamins, minerals, or electrolytes can be harmful, especially in people with kidney, heart, or metabolic disease.
One documented severe case involved septic shock after IV infusion at a clinic, prompting regulatory warnings. 2
Because many IV hydration spa treatments are considered elective wellness services, they often are not covered by insurance and entail out-of-pocket cost. 1
Moreover, the purported benefits (immune boost, detoxification, faster recovery) generally lack support from robust clinical trials. Some components may show preliminary signals in laboratory or small-scale studies, but translating those into consistent advantages in real-world patients remains unproven. 1
From a clinical medicine perspective, many of the conditions for which IV hydration spas are marketed—mild dehydration, hangover, general fatigue can often be managed through conventional treatment (oral rehydration, rest, symptomatic care). The potential benefits of IV therapy do not necessarily exceed those of simpler, lower-risk interventions for many individuals.
Clinicians advising patients may consider asking:
What is the intended benefit, and is it supported by clinical evidence?
Are the components (vitamins, electrolytes) tailored to lab findings, or given empirically?
Who will supervise the infusion—licensed nurse, physician, or otherwise?
What are the facility’s hygiene, sterility, and monitoring protocols?
Is there a plan to manage adverse events or complications?
In summary, while IV hydration spas are gaining popularity, their regulatory oversight is variable, and their safety and efficacy remain incompletely established. Medical professionals stress caution, scrutiny of facility practices, and informed decision-making by patients.
1. Are IV hydration treatments good?
For most healthy individuals, IV hydration is not medically necessary. The body typically maintains fluid and electrolyte balance through oral intake unless a person is severely dehydrated due to illness, heatstroke, or medical conditions that limit oral hydration. In hospitals, IV therapy is used under medical supervision when oral rehydration is not possible or adequate.
2. What are the main risks of getting IV hydration at wellness spas?
The potential risks include infection at the IV site, vein inflammation (phlebitis), air embolism, allergic reactions, and electrolyte imbalance. There have also been isolated reports of sepsis linked to improper sterile techniques at some spas. These risks can increase when staff are not adequately trained or when treatments are administered without a physician’s evaluation.
3. How can consumers identify safe and legitimate IV hydration providers?
Consumers should verify whether the spa is overseen by a licensed physician, confirm the credentials of staff administering the IV, and ensure that all infusions are performed with sterile, single-use equipment. It’s also important to ask for a list of ingredients in the infusion and avoid any formulations that promise “miracle” results or use unverified compounds.
References
Sivakumar, Anishaa, Howard P. Forman, Isabel Wang, Peter Lurie, and Joseph S. Ross. “State Policies and Facility Practices of IV Hydration Spas in the US.” JAMA Internal Medicine, published online October 6, 2025. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2025.5028.
Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI). “Booming IV Hydration Spa Industry Needs More Oversight, Researchers Say.” CSPI, October 6, 2025. Accessed 11 October 2025. https://www.cspi.org/press-release/booming-iv-hydration-spa-industry-needs-more-oversight-researchers-say.
(Rh/Eth/TL)