Surgeons Test Different Skin Antiseptics for Infection Prevention. (Image: Pixabay) 
Fitness and Wellness

Surgeons Test Different Skin Antiseptics for Infection Prevention

1,600 patients undergoing surgery to treat an open fracture, have found that orthopedic surgeons’ choice of antiseptic skin preparation solution does not impact the risk of surgical site infection.

MedBound Times

A large study of over 1,600 patients undergoing surgery to treat an open fracture, has found that orthopedic surgeons’ choice of antiseptic skin preparation solution does not impact the risk of surgical site infection.

Patients randomized to receive aqueous 10% povidone-iodine or aqueous 4% chlorhexidine gluconate for skin antisepsis experienced similar rates of postoperative surgical site infections and unplanned reoperations.

The study, published in The Lancet, was jointly led by researchers at the McMaster University Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine and the University of Maryland School of Medicine.

The authors conclude that orthopedic surgeons may select either aqueous 10% povidone-iodine or aqueous 4% chlorhexidine gluconate antiseptic preparation solutions based on solution availability, patient contraindications, or product cost. They add the findings might also have implications for the antisepsis of other traumatic wounds.

This trial was funded by the U.S. Department of Defense, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, McMaster University Surgical Associates, and the PSI Foundation. (SM/Newswise)

Download the MedBound app & learn new things everyday

How Serious Car Accidents Can Lead to Long-Term Physical and Emotional Injuries

Too Sick to Work, Americans Worry Trump’s Bill Strip Health Insurance

What Role Does a CRO Play in Clinical Trial Execution

West Bengal Man Goes for Hernia Surgery, Appendix Removed Instead

What Is Asbestos and How Can It Impact Your Health?