In Shark Tank India Season 5, a wellness founder sparked controversy after introducing himself as a doctor without holding a recognized medical degree, prompting sharp criticism from the Sharks over ethics, credibility, and public safety in health related businesses.
The latest season of Shark Tank India opened on a controversial note after a wellness entrepreneur faced sharp criticism for calling himself a doctor despite not holding a recognized medical degree. The pitch quickly turned into one of the most intense moments of Season 5, with investors questioning credibility, ethics, and the responsibility that comes with selling health related products.
Founder Manoj Das, who introduced himself as “Dr. Manoj Das”, presented his aromatherapy and natural wellness brand Lewisia Wellness to the Sharks. He revealed that he was currently pursuing a bachelor’s degree in aromatherapy. This disclosure immediately raised concerns among the panel, who questioned how he could legally use the title of a doctor while still studying.
Investor Anupam Mittal led the questioning, expressing disbelief and warning that misrepresenting oneself as a doctor could have serious legal consequences. His reaction set the tone for the rest of the pitch, as the Sharks became increasingly skeptical of both the founder and the business.
“If you’re caught misusing the ‘doctor’ title, regulators could take action.” warned Anupam Mittal.
Das asked for ₹1 crore in exchange for just 1 percent equity, placing his company’s valuation at ₹100 crore. The figure shocked the panel. The Sharks pressed him to explain how the valuation was justified, especially when the brand appeared to have limited customer reviews and inconsistent performance indicators.
Aman Gupta questioned the authenticity of the brand’s online presence, pointing out that a company claiming large scale success should have stronger and more reliable customer feedback. The panel also raised concerns about how the business was funded and whether its revenue claims could be verified.
The pitch became more serious when discussions turned to the wellness products themselves. The Sharks cautioned that selling products linked to health and healing requires transparency and accountability. Any misleading claim could potentially harm consumers, especially in a space where trust is crucial.
Namita Thapar emphasised that exaggerated credentials and unclear claims damage not just one business but the entire health and wellness ecosystem.
At the height of the exchange, Anupam Mittal bluntly questioned the intent behind the pitch, asking whether the founder had come prepared or was inviting controversy.
From a regulatory perspective, using the title “doctor” without holding a recognized qualification can mislead consumers and may attract scrutiny under professional regulations and consumer protection laws in India, particularly when health related products are involved.
In India, professional medical titles are protected under regulatory frameworks, and their misuse in commercial or health related settings is widely viewed as an ethical and consumer protection concern.
After extensive questioning, the panel unanimously rejected the pitch. The Sharks made it clear that no amount of storytelling or branding can compensate for unclear credentials and unsupported business fundamentals.
Can someone legally call themselves a doctor without a medical degree in India?
No. In India, the title “doctor” is legally associated with recognized qualifications regulated by statutory bodies such as the National Medical Commission. Using the title without appropriate credentials, especially in health related contexts, can be considered misleading and invite legal action.
What legal risks are involved in misusing the title “doctor”?
Misrepresentation of professional credentials may violate consumer protection laws if it misleads the public. In health and wellness businesses, this can raise concerns about false advertising, unethical practice, and public safety.
Why is misuse of the title “doctor” taken seriously in health related businesses?
Because the title implies medical expertise and authority. When used inaccurately, consumers may make health decisions based on misplaced trust, which regulators and medical professionals view as a public safety issue rather than a branding choice.
National Medical Commission. “Professional Conduct Regulations and Use of Medical Titles.” Government of India. Accessed January 2026. https://www.nmc.org.in
Consumer Protection Act, 2019. Government of India. https://consumeraffairs.nic.in
(Rh/ARC/MSM)
