
With the ever-growing and ceaseless use of Artificial Intelligence (AI), the world is experimenting with technology more than ever.
A Reddit user claimed to have used artificial intelligence to apply for 1,000 jobs, resulting in 50 interviews, while they were "half asleep." This revelation, shared in the forum ‘Get Employed,’ has sparked curiosity and debate. The user also provided a roadmap for leveraging AI to create structured CVs.
The user designed an AI bot capable of analyzing candidate information, evaluating job portfolios, crafting tailored resumes and cover letters, preparing responses to likely interview questions, and automatically applying for jobs. What’s remarkable is that the entire process unfolded while the user was soundly asleep, leaving AI to handle the task.
While AI has the potential to enhance human life and simplify tasks, its growing overdependence raises concerns. Relying too heavily on AI could be detrimental to the human brain and may erode the "human touch."
Currently, many recruiters use AI systems to sort resumes, making it essential for applicants to refine their CVs for better language and structure. However, this reliance on AI also leaves applicants questioning how many tailored CVs they must create to secure at least one job interview. It highlights the challenges of landing a job in an era where even AI-driven applications struggle to guarantee success.
The Reddit user also raised ethical concerns about AI’s role in the hiring process and beyond. While AI can boost efficiency, the discussion emphasized the importance of preserving human values such as focus, deep thinking, communication, and empathy—qualities that define humanity.
“Will the need for human recruiters decline?”
“In an ocean of applications that seem flawless, how will we be able to identify true talent?”
“Is a recruiting "AI arms race" on the horizon?”
The conversation continued with a consensus that while AI can significantly increase efficiency, humans must avoid using it merely as an external tool for storing information. Users thought a balance must be maintained, ensuring AI complements human effort rather than replacing essential human qualities.
(Rehash/Sanika Dongre/ MSM)